InnoVest Resource Management's Foreclosure Forum

Home Discussion Board "Hands-On" Training Title Holding Trust Annual Reunion Speaking Schedule Store Foreclosure Fundamentals Code References 50 State Foreclosure Basics Foreclosure Glossary Foreclosure Statistics 75+ Yrs Interest Rates Fillable Forms Archived Articles Dingbat Retirement Plan Links Contact / Map | Priceline Tips About Us Home

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Forum Board ] [ FAQ ] Re: No. Don't drink the Kool-Aid (nt) Posted by Kristine-CA on July 31, 2011 at 7:10 PM In Reply to: Re: No. Don't drink the Kool-Aid (nt) posted by Rod Ciferri on July 31, 2011 at 10:16 AM There are some holes in your theories, some the size of the Grand Canyon, but do let us know how it turns out. Owners in foreclosure transfer their property all the time, before and after trustee's sale.....it doesn't make the lien go away or put someone else in line for title. A lender or third party purchasers at sale can and will be able to evict you, with or without a deed. You say the difference is that you have a deed. But almost every foreclosed owner in CA has a deed. An unlawful detainer suit will not help either party with title issues. You will be defendant in an unlawful detainer, so you would have to object on grounds that the lender or 3rd party is not an eligible party to evict. Good luck with that one. You have some very whacked notions about MERS and produce the note strategies for CA. You might want to do a little more research on what cases have set precedent for lenders/servicers and note possession. Happy researching and happy trespassing. Kristine : : : : Ok, sorry. I'm in California. A non-judicial foreclosure sale has been started against a property. Assuming that sale is void, and I buy a quitclaim deed from the "former" owner post-sale : : : : On the surface, it sounds like a guru's 'system'. : : Proceed with extreme caution. : Guess I would be the "guru" on this one. I'll let you know how it goes. Caution is certainly warranted. A lender who bought back at a foreclosure sale would probably see me as a trespasser. The difference is I have a deed. Follow Ups: Boy this guy is a case Perry Mason 4:38 AM, 08/01/11 (0) Re: No. Don't drink the Kool-Aid (nt) Rod Ciferri 9:06 PM, 07/31/11 (11) Re: No. Don't drink the Kool-Aid (nt) Kristine-CA 10:13 AM, 08/01/11 (1) Re: No. Don't drink the Kool-Aid (nt) Rod Ciferri 9:15 PM, 08/01/11 (0) Re: No. Don't drink the Kool-Aid (nt) 427 0:51 AM, 08/01/11 (8) Re: No. Don't drink the Kool-Aid (nt) Rod Ciferri 7:26 AM, 08/01/11 (7) Come on guy BIG 8:32 PM, 08/01/11 (1) Re: Come on guy Rod Ciferri 8:48 PM, 08/01/11 (0) Re: No. Don't drink the Kool-Aid (nt) Bill H 11:38 AM, 08/01/11 (4) Re: No. Don't drink the Kool-Aid (nt) Rod Ciferri 8:59 PM, 08/01/11 (1) Re: No. Don't drink the Kool-Aid (nt) 427 0:21 AM, 08/03/11 (0) Re: No. Don't drink the Kool-Aid (nt) George Castleberry 1:54 PM, 08/01/11 (1) Re: No. Don't drink the Kool-Aid (nt) Rod Ciferri 9:06 PM, 08/01/11 (0) Post a Followup: Name : E-Mail : Subject : Comments: : There are some holes in your theories, some the size of the Grand Canyon, but do let us know how it turns out. Owners in foreclosure transfer their property all the time, before and after trustee's sale.....it doesn't make the lien go away or put someone else in line for title. A lender or third party purchasers at sale can and will be able to evict you, with or without a deed. You say the difference is that you have a deed. But almost every foreclosed owner in CA has a deed. : An unlawful detainer suit will not help either party with title issues. You will be defendant in an unlawful detainer, so you would have to object on grounds that the lender or 3rd party is not an eligible party to evict. Good luck with that one. : You have some very whacked notions about MERS and produce the note strategies for CA. You might want to do a little more research on what cases have set precedent for lenders/servicers and note possession. : Happy researching and happy trespassing. Kristine : : : : : Ok, sorry. I'm in California. A non-judicial foreclosure sale has been started against a property. Assuming that sale is void, and I buy a quitclaim deed from the "former" owner post-sale : : : : : : On the surface, it sounds like a guru's 'system'. : : : Proceed with extreme caution. : : Guess I would be the "guru" on this one. I'll let you know how it goes. Caution is certainly warranted. A lender who bought back at a foreclosure sale would probably see me as a trespasser. The difference is I have a deed. [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Forum Board ] [ FAQ ] WWWAdmin 2.0a © 1997 Matt Wright and DBasics Software Company, All Rights Reserved

Information provided by this website is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Please consult your investment advisor and/or attorney before entering into any transaction. Read our privacy policy.

Copyright © 1997-date("Y"), InnoVest Resource Management
http://www.foreclosureforum.com

InnoVest Resource Management, 4569-A Mission Gorge Place, San Diego CA 92120-4112
(619) 283-5444, Fax (619) 283-5455